MINUTES - QUARTERLY HEALTH & SAFETY MEETING
- Risk Management and AFSCME DC47 –
November 27,
2007
Attendees: Kathy Black, Jerry Roseman, Barry Scott,
Kendall Banks, Louise Carpino, Mario Ferrari, Rita Urwitz,
Jamilla Abdur Rahman, Hilary Cornell, Levar Clark
1. Thermal Comfort Policy Status – YaY!!! The
Thermal Comfort Policy was signed by the MDO on 11/26/07
and will be issued shortly to all departments. Concerns
were raised about enforcement of the policy, which will
involve relocating/reassigning employees in certain situations,
in the face of reluctance from local departmental managers.
Barry responded that these issues would be dealt with
on a case-by-case basis.
2. Bomb Threat Policy – Kathy raised concerns
about communication in connection with the Bomb Threat
Policy by describing a bomb scare that occurred at 1515
Arch Street in October during which there was little
or no communication with building occupants and so there
was chaos. Barry acknowledged the problems that occurred
during the incident but differentiated a “bomb
scare” from a “bomb threat.” According
to Barry what happened at 1515 Arch is characterized
as a “bomb scare” (i.e someone reported a “suspicious
package” inside the building) vs a “bomb
threat” – i.e. a “called-in” threat.
The policy is primarily designed to respond to “Bomb
Threats” in which there is a 2-phased response:
(1) Investigation; and (2) Specific response IF something
is found. Risk will continue to work on improving the
way “bomb scares” are dealt with, keeping
in mind that the police department is in control once
a bomb scare is reported.
Barry also said that fire captain training will be set
up and this new policy will be on the agenda. He recognizes
the fine line that exists between providing communication
to reduce anxiety and meeting the requirements of the
police. The police often do not want anything communicated,
and view evacuation as an opportunity for injury.
3. Ergonomic Training for Court Employees – Courts
have finally agreed to conduct training and that the
training will be mandatory. Three (3) training locations
have been designated- 1801 Vine Street; 1401 Arch Street;
and 34 S. 11th Street. Union involvement was not solicited
or allowed. Shonda Holloway will do individual assessments
for each employee who has gone to the training session.
4. New Attorney – The new attorney, Hilary Cornell
was briefly introduced, but did she did not stay to participate
in the meeting.
5. Probation Officers and Personal Vehicle – – The
problems and issues raised by Tony Moore (Local 810)
at the previous quarterly meeting, related to the real-world
need for probation officers to use personal vehicles
when conducting home visits (for juvenile offenders),
were addressed by the First Judicial District agreeing
to accept personal car use as a customary and necessary
element of probation officer work.
The use of the Personal Auto Program (P.A.P.) will be
determined based on the percentage of time that the P.O.
uses his/her car – it is for 60%+ drivers.
The next issue that will be tackled by Risk, the FJD
and Local 810 will be the details associated with mileage
reimbursement
6. Toxic Mold - Risk did not yet have the protocol ready
to distribute as the first draft that was developed needed
major revisions. At the previous meeting Mike Rudman
said that he was working on the protocol, investigation
techniques, etc., with Risk’s consultant, One Source.
Risk objected to the word “toxic,” and will
not be using it in the protocol.
7. Health & Safety Committee Training - Risk provided
a one page summary titled “Overview and Requirements
for Departmental Safety Committees” [dated 11/7/07]
that addressed many of the concerns expressed by the
union at the previous meeting.
Worker representatives are to be selected by the union
and only if the union has no employees to select, can
the department ask the union, in writing, if it is ok
for the department to ask for volunteers.
There was agreement that financial and other incentive
programs aimed at rewarding people for reductions in
workplace injury-illness are not appropriate.
Finally, Barry stated that the Safety Committee “model” is
considered to be a pro-active or performance-based approach
instead of a grievance-based approach.
Rich Shreve was identified as the consultant who has
attended some department Health and Safety Committee
meetings. His role will be to help with maintenance of
committees, continuity, meeting state requirements, and
evaluating success.
The union expressed concerns that too much uniformity
was expected of the department committees. While we understand
the need for certain consistencies and requirements,
there are enough differences among the work areas that
allowances should be made. Risk replied that the State
doesn’t make many allowances but they would work
with us as best they can on specific issues.
Risk also said that the State allows for separate committees
for different unions in the same workplace. They also
agreed with the Union that specific issue training would
be good for committee members.
8. Airport Update – Jack McCourt has resigned
from his position as Health & Safety Director of
the Airport (he has since rescinded that resignation
and remains at the Airport in the same position).
The investigation of the accidental death of a DC33
member at the airport continues. There will definitely
be lessons learned from this tragic episode, which we
hope will be applicable to others. Fairmount Park will
be providing some safety training for the Pavement and
Grounds Crew at the airport, and specific procedures
for their work will be produced in writing.
9. COPA II Forms – Barry reported that the change
from Ward North America to CSI as the city’s TPA
slowed the capture of data from these forms, so they
do not yet have useful data from the revised forms. They
are tracking which departments are turning in forms accurately,
completely and timely.
Regarding forwarding DC47 members’ forms to Kathy
Black, Barry admitted that he had failed to convey this
procedure to Comp Services until reminded and he agreed
to make sure they followed this procedure in the future.
Our next meeting was set for Tuesday, February
26, 2008, 10:00 a.m. at Risk Management’s office,
1515 Arch Street, 14th floor.
|